Mining Current Issues Carrier Sekani Tribal Council

Current law presumes that mining is an acceptable use of a piece of land, but the presumption should instead be that aboriginal rights require heightened scrutiny of mining activities. Reform should ensure more First Nations’ involvement in

The Carrier Sekani Tribal Council (CSTC) provides political and technical support to seven member First Nations. CSTC also coordinates Government to Government (G2G) negotiations between our member nations and the Provincial and Federal Governments.

CSFN Omineca Demonstration Project Renewal Agreement (Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, Nadleh Whut’en, Nak’azdli, Saik’uz, Stellat’en, Takla Lake, Tl’azt’en, and Ts’il Kah Noh (Burns Lake Band) Forestry Agreements. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Interim Forestry Revenue Sharing Agreement (IFRSA) - 2021

carrier sekani tribal council bc treaty commission. In the late 1980s the elders and leaders of the newly formed Carrier Sekani Tribal Council CSTC came together and decided that it was time that social and health issues were brought to the

20/11/2010· The dam and reservoir altered the water flow to the Nechako River, to which the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council First Nations (“CSTC”) have a land claim. The CSTC was not consulted on the building of the dam. In 2007 B.C. Hydro, a Crown corporation, entered into an agreement with Alcan, the owner of the dam, to purchase the excess power created by the

Carrier Sekani Tribal Chief Phone: 250-562-6279 Ext: 203 Fax: 250-562-8206 [email protected]. History and Timeline of Tribal Council Leadership. 2019 – Current – Tribal Chief Mina Holmes (Tl’azt’en) 2018 – Interim Tribal Chief Reg Mueller (Saik’uz)

Carrier Sekani Tribal Council < PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE - 6th Avenue V2L2N2 Phone: 562-6279 Fax: Carol Jones, Chair Kemess North Joint Review Panel Raymond Crook Panel Secretariat PO Box 8856 Victoria, B.C. V8W 3Z1 VIA Fax to: 250-387-2208 HEAD OFFICE First. IED Wednesday, May 23, 2007 RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2007 KEMESS NORTH JOINT REVIEW

Treaty Stage. Stage 4 - Agreement-in-Principle negotiations; Completed Agreements. None in treaty; Other Negotiations. Environmental Stewardship Agreements. CSFN Omineca Demonstration Project Renewal Agreement (Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, Nadleh Whut’en, Nak’azdli, Saik’uz, Stellat’en, Takla Lake, Tl’azt’en, and Ts’il Kah Noh (Burns Lake Band),

20/11/2010· The dam and reservoir altered the water flow to the Nechako River, to which the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council First Nations (“CSTC”) have a land claim. The CSTC was not consulted on the building of the dam. In 2007 B.C. Hydro, a Crown corporation, entered into an agreement with Alcan, the owner of the dam, to purchase the excess power created by the

25/06/2014· In Rio Tinto Alcan versus Carrier Sekani Tribal Council (2010), the Supreme Court of Canada explained that a duty to consult arises from current government conduct and is limited to the specific Crown proposal at issue and not to a larger project of which the current proposal merely forms a part. However, this case is probably not the end of the story. The British

24/12/2021· This page contains a form to search the Supreme Court of Canada case information database. You can search by the SCC 5-digit case number, by name or word in the style of cause, or by file number from the appeal court.

Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, 2010 SCC 43 . On October 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision which addresses the role of a statutory commission when dealing with issues of aboriginal consultation under section 35 of the Constitution. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) welcomes this decision, which clarifies the role

02/11/2010· Author(s): Sander Duncanson, Shawn Denstedt, QC, Terri-Lee Oleniuk. Nov 2, 2010. On October 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada released its unanimous decision in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, which confirms that prior and continuing impacts on Aboriginal rights, including prior failures to consult, will only trigger a duty to consult

03/11/2010· On October 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada released its unanimous decision in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council 1 and held that the British Columbia Utilities Commission ("BCUC") had the authority to consider whether adequate Crown consultation with aboriginal peoples occurred in connection with its review of whether an

Carrier Sekani Tribal Council < PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE - 6th Avenue V2L2N2 Phone: 562-6279 Fax: Carol Jones, Chair Kemess North Joint Review Panel Raymond Crook Panel Secretariat PO Box 8856 Victoria, B.C. V8W 3Z1 VIA Fax to: 250-387-2208 HEAD OFFICE First. IED Wednesday, May 23, 2007 RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2007 KEMESS NORTH JOINT REVIEW

There are many mining/gas and oil projects operating in Canada right now, including Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline project. The Carrier Sekani Tribal Council has been opposed to that project for nearly six years. It will be keeping an eye on RBC when Enbridge will be looking for financial backing for its project.

Carrier-Sekani Tribal Council,British Columbia pipeline issues (oil, LNG. Enbridge, Kinder-Morgan) Yukon (mineral and Final Agreement implementation) Pacific Trails Natural Gas Pipeline limited partnership (for 15 First Nations, Carrier – Sekani) Mining Agreement Negotiations (interior B.C., Yukon, Ontario) Tree Farm Licence and Forest Licence purchases and General

25/06/2014· In Rio Tinto Alcan versus Carrier Sekani Tribal Council (2010), the Supreme Court of Canada explained that a duty to consult arises from current government conduct and is limited to the specific Crown proposal at issue and not to a larger project of which the current proposal merely forms a part. However, this case is probably not the end of the story. The British

02/11/2010· Author(s): Sander Duncanson, Shawn Denstedt, QC, Terri-Lee Oleniuk. Nov 2, 2010. On October 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada released its unanimous decision in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, which confirms that prior and continuing impacts on Aboriginal rights, including prior failures to consult, will only trigger a duty to consult

THE CARRIER SEKANI TRIBAL COUNCIL AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA as represented by THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT ("Canada") AND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA as represented by THE MINISTER OF ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS

03/11/2010· On October 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada released its unanimous decision in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council 1 and held that the British Columbia Utilities Commission ("BCUC") had the authority to consider whether adequate Crown consultation with aboriginal peoples occurred in connection with its review of whether an

Carrier Sekani Tribal Council < PRINCE GEORGE OFFICE - 6th Avenue V2L2N2 Phone: 562-6279 Fax: Carol Jones, Chair Kemess North Joint Review Panel Raymond Crook Panel Secretariat PO Box 8856 Victoria, B.C. V8W 3Z1 VIA Fax to: 250-387-2208 HEAD OFFICE First. IED Wednesday, May 23, 2007 RECEIVED MAY 2 3 2007 KEMESS NORTH JOINT REVIEW

23/10/2021· The Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, which represents seven First Nations in the province's central Interior, is also urging the B.C. government to provide booster shots to Indigenous communities before next year. Priscilla Mueller, Chief of the Saik'uz First Nation and a board director of the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, echoed the message that third doses

Carrier-Sekani Tribal Council,British Columbia pipeline issues (oil, LNG. Enbridge, Kinder-Morgan) Yukon (mineral and Final Agreement implementation) Pacific Trails Natural Gas Pipeline limited partnership (for 15 First Nations, Carrier – Sekani) Mining Agreement Negotiations (interior B.C., Yukon, Ontario) Tree Farm Licence and Forest Licence purchases and General

16/01/2013· British Columbia (Minister of Forests) 4 (Haida) and more recently in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council (Rio Tinto): (i) the Crown had knowledge of the RRDC’s asserted Aboriginal claims; (ii) there was contemplated Crown conduct in the form of the recording of a mineral claim and (iii) there was a potential that the Crown’s conduct may adversely affect

23/01/2013· British Columbia (Minister of Forests) 4 (Haida) and more recently in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council (Rio Tinto): (i) the Crown had knowledge of the RRDC's asserted Aboriginal claims; (ii) there was contemplated Crown conduct in the form of the recording of a mineral claim and (iii) there was a potential that the Crown's conduct may adversely affect

30/04/2017· Terry Teegee, tribal chief of the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, said another problem rural and remote communities face is the proximity to health care services.